The two known best sellers are the whirlpool duet and the whirlpool tandem. The former is a hydraulic single or double cylinder, fixed belt drive device that was originally designed for use on jet aircraft. The whirlpool is basically a two-stage centrifugal pump driven by an impeller that is mounted in the rear of the pump’s fan blade. This type of pump has the ability to increase both the rotation speed and the centrifugal force, which result in improved thrust power. It was initially designed for use in aerospace applications and is a design that has been used in various types of aircraft engines for decades.
Whirlpool Duet Lawsuit
It was soon after the product’s release that the real purpose for which it was designed became obvious. It was intended to be used for lawn irrigation. Lawn sprinklers require a powerful source of water pressure because they often operate with lower pressure than stand alone units. A low pressure setting on these devices can lead to faulty connections and even short circuits that can result in injury to the user. With the help of a powerful motor like the one found in a whirlpool, lawn irrigation can be achieved without the risk of a fire or explosion.
These dual motion pumps tend to utilize a small yet powerful source of motor.
This is the motor that propels the blades of the unit to turn. This powerful source of motor has an added benefit of improving air quality inside the home. This is because the water in the lawn is pushed through a larger filtration system. With the presence of a larger filtration unit, airborne pollutants such as pollen, dust, and pet dander are filtered out from the air. Some experts believe that this additional filtering system could even prevent serious health problems such as asthma from occurring.
The first version of this dual action device was introduced in the year nineteen seventy-nine when it was first offered in stores by Hillsborough, New York.
A major manufacturer of vacuum cleaners at the time, Hillsborough soon began selling the Whirlpool Duet due to the overwhelming success it received. When the duet lawsuit was first launched, it was known for being bulky and rather uncomfortable to use. However, with time, the design of the device was improved, and in nineteen ninety-one it was offered in stores across the United States. With improvements to the motor, the device’s comfort level and usefulness as a weapon against dust and airborne pollutants grew.
The duet vacuum cleaner was also proven to relieve pressure on the shoulders of users. Some users even reported pain, reducing the strain on their backs.
Users also noted the improved circulation that resulted from using the Whirlpool Duet. Many users stated that they were able to obtain a more thorough cleaning job because the vacuum was less likely to miss debris and hair. Another benefit reported by users of the duet was the elimination of dryer lint which was common with other vacuum devices. This feature was responsible for reducing the amount of time it took to dry clothes.
The duet lawsuit had a significant impact on the sales of Whirlpool appliances. The company did experience a slight decrease in sales after the first year of release of the device, but this trend soon wore off. More consumers began reporting problems with the device, which led to lower production numbers and an overall decline in consumer satisfaction with the product. Many customers who purchased a whirlpool vacuum were not aware that such problems existed, and as a result the company lost quite a bit of money when bringing the lawsuit forward.
The Whirlpool Duet lawsuit was eventually discontinued after several lawsuits were filed against the company claiming a variety of defects in the product.
It should be noted that there were many loyalists to the product who believed the device to be an excellent choice. The Duet lawsuit nonetheless forced Whirlpool to re-evaluate its design, leading to an overall decline in customer satisfaction with the company.
The Duet lawsuit nevertheless remains to this day one of the most notable instances when a company faced a lawsuit claiming the products caused injury or damage. The majority of cases brought forth against a manufacturer can be categorized as negligence claims; that is, if the manufacturer was aware of the dangers of their product, yet failed to take measures to protect themselves or others from harm. In many of these cases, the manufacturer was also found to be negligent, leading to a judgment against them. This is true of all industries, but the clothing industry has historically been the largest victim of such lawsuits. As a result, many users of the vacuum remain dissatisfied with the quality of the devices and, in some cases, have chosen to purchase new vacuums instead of taking the risk of purchasing a used or refurbished one.