You have heard about the Champion Pet Food Lawsuit, but do you know the facts behind it? Here are some important points to keep in mind. The lawsuit aims to prevent pet owners from exposing their dogs to dangerous ingredients found in dog food. This article discusses the issue of heavy metal contamination in dog food. It also covers the false labeling of the product, as well as BPA in dog food. Read on to learn more.
Class action lawsuit
In a recent class action lawsuit against Champion Pet Food, plaintiffs alleged that the company violated the MPCFA by falsifying their claims about the quality of the ingredients in their products. In addition, the company falsely claimed that their dog food was made with fresh regional ingredients, delivered nutrients naturally, and nourished dogs as nature intended. In reality, the ingredients in the food contained BPA, heavy metals, pentobarbital, and other chemicals.
The plaintiffs argued that Champion lacked adequate standing because its packaging misled consumers about the nutritional benefits of its Acana and Orijen dog foods. The judge sided with the plaintiffs and ruled in their favor. This ruling also makes it difficult for consumers to prove that pet food contains heavy metals, and the plaintiffs cited the lack of transparency in the company’s labeling.
Heavy metal contamination
The recent study of heavy metal contamination in Champion Pet Food revealed some alarming results. The sample had an aluminum concentration of 215 parts per million, and several other potentially toxic metals – including nickel and tin – were found at over one part per million. The study also found that some of the samples contained uranium. Thankfully, the findings were small, but the study does raise some questions. Listed below are some of the findings.
Plaintiffs’ lawsuit against Champion Pet Food claims that its dog foods contain high levels of heavy metals and bisphenol A. The lawsuit is seeking to prevent Champion from selling its products, require the company to disclose the contents of their dog foods, and compensate consumers for the health effects. The company is also being sued for making false claims about the safety of its pet food. In the meantime, consumers have many questions about the safety of these foods.
A federal judge dismissed a class action lawsuit against Champion Petfoods USA because the company did not properly test its red meat versions of Acana and Orijen dog foods for heavy metals and controlled substances. In November 2016, a group of pet owners filed suit, alleging that the company had erred by failing to test these dog foods for heavy metals and misleading statements on their packaging. On the other hand, a class action lawsuit against the company in Illinois and Massachusetts have also been dismissed.
The lawsuit cites multiple violations of the MPCFA, including the failure to disclose information about the ingredients. The plaintiffs say that Champion included misleading statements on dog food bags, causing confusion among consumers. This case also points out the importance of reading labels and finding out if the information is accurate before making a purchase. The lawsuit also cites examples of product recalls related to these products. Nonetheless, this lawsuit may not be successful.
BPA in dog food
The plaintiff in a lawsuit against Champion Pet Food asserted that the BPA contained in their dog food was not biologically appropriate. The manufacturer argued that the level of BPA contained in their products would not be harmful to dogs, but the plaintiff argues that the evidence does not support this conclusion. In addition, Weaver said that the dog food contains tallows that are rendered from beef carcasses, which would make the levels of BPA in its dog food a non-issue.
Upon further examination, the plaintiffs’ allegations regarding the presence of pentobarbital were dismissed. This is because the defendant’s beef contained low levels of this chemical, which would not be harmful to dogs. However, weaver stopped buying the defendant’s dog food once she learned that the food contained pentobarbital, and argued that the company had breached its duty to warn of the potential health risks associated with its products.