In a Class Action Lawsuit against Boingo, attorneys for the plaintiffs maintain that they are owed a handsome amount for their efforts. The crux of the case rests on the fact that, as time has passed, the design and production process of the game has significantly changed. With the advent of computer software designers who have outsourced the production of the game to third-party entities, the design of the game itself has changed. Most importantly, however, the quality of many of the casino software that bears the name of Boingo has deteriorated considerably.
Class Action Lawsuit Against BoEing
One of the reasons that casino software designers often outsource the production of their games to other entities is because it is much cheaper to do so. However, what most players do not realize is that while it may be cheaper to produce a game that requires fewer materials to produce, it is much more expensive to alter the content or structure of the game itself. What does this mean to the typical player? While most online casinos strive to provide their patrons with the most realistic casino experience possible, there are certain characteristics of the standard version of the game that make it uniquely different from what one could expect if they played the game in a brick and mortar casino. If a current plaintiff playing the game can prove that they were given an unfair advantage due to these changes, they may be able to garner damages that are substantial enough to force the defendants to pay out damages to their customers.
Among the many complaints that current players have with Boingo’s top-ranked online casino is that they are consistently given odds that favor them.
In many instances, the odds favor the more experienced players more than they do the novice players. One reason for this is that the majority of the programming that controls the way that the game is programmed was put together by software engineers who do not have the same level of expertise that the programmers who write the games are able to bring to the task. Because of this, it is not uncommon for experienced gamers to find that they have to shell out large amounts of virtual currency just to make it to the final tables. This practice has become known as “bingging” and players who engage in this behavior are often reprimanded or even terminated from the site.
Plaintiffs who win such lawsuits ultimately hope to recoup some of the revenue that they would otherwise lose if they were charged with “fraudulent” practices when playing the game in a normal brick and mortar casino.
When companies engage in what is called “botting” – which is the practice of using a set number of computer programs to generate numbers and play the game in an effort to cheat the system – they run the risk of being sued for malpractice. It is true that no attorney will ever be able to determine with 100 percent accuracy whether or not a given transaction is fraudulent. However, the likelihood of a successful lawsuit based on this theory is fairly good. In addition to having the potential to award large sums of money, winning such a case can help expose other websites that engage in similar activities and can also serve to warn current players about potentially fraudulent gaming sites.
A class action lawsuit against Boeing highlights a very real issue that many consumers face when they choose to engage in online games.
While games are becoming increasingly sophisticated and offer many more opportunities for interaction, some users are finding that the game they have invested time and money into is providing them with fewer opportunities for engaging in the “game of the gods”. While it is impossible to quantify how many individuals will ultimately be affected by a site’s actions, there is plenty of evidence that suggests that there is a trend for individuals to lose money more frequently than they make. If the site has a policy of paying out winners, and there is a way for that policy to be circumvented, then individuals who are active on the site will eventually be unable to reinvest their winnings for a future game. The resulting “payout” for the original game often does not adequately cover the expenses incurred in that game. Instead, the “subsidy” offered to the participant simply sits there, allowing the participants to enjoy the game and spend more time playing rather than actually playing.
As you can see, the BoEing class action lawsuit provides a unique opportunity to take a proactive step in protecting yourself from this potential issue.
By taking advantage of a template created by attorneys across the country, you can develop a cohesive plan to fight back against BoEing and their competitors. If you do not yet know of a legal case in your area that involves this specific problem, it is likely that you can find one among the numerous websites that provide information on such issues. Being proactive and seeking legal advice from qualified professionals is clearly the best way to ensure that you are properly protecting your interests in this case.